Comparing Firmware Development Environments
All posts written without LLM assistance unless otherwise noted.
Loading graph...
---
config:
xyChart:
width: 900
xAxis:
labelFontSize: 12
themeVariables:
xyChart:
plotColorPalette: "#b342a0"
---
xychart-beta
title "Zephyr Build System Benchmark"
x-axis "Platform" ["Ubuntu 24.04 6.8", "WSL2 24.04 5.15", "WSL2 24.04 6.1", "macOS Sonoma*", "Windows 11", "VMWare (no AMD-V)" ]
y-axis "Build duration in seconds (lower is better)" 0 --> 1680
bar [664.44, 754.642, 723.323, 741.547, 1393.901, 1655.560]
About a year and a half ago, I decided to take a different approach to setting up a Zephyr environment for a new project at Intercreate. Instead of using my trusty VMWare Workstation Linux VM, I opted for WSL2. I was curious to find out: Would hardware pass-through for debugging work reliably? Would all of the tooling dependencies be supported? What about build system performance?
Not only did everything go smoothly, but since then, many colleagues have also moved from native Linux or traditional VMs to WSL2 and seen great results.
© 2024 by JP Hutchins. Published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.
